June 14, 2005

Because Americans are Gossiphounds


Tired of celebrity coverage? Millions of readers can't get enough - and neither can advertisers. Publishers of celebrity magazines that once looked to newsstand and checkout-aisle sales for almost all of their revenue are now experiencing surges in subscriptions and ad sales, bringing in the kind of money that could make a movie star jealous.

Us Weekly's ad pages are up nearly 25 percent in the last year, and at Star Magazine, ads are up almost 17 percent, according to the Publishers Information Bureau. In Touch Weekly's ads have risen nearly 22 percent.

Advertisers are finding star-focused magazines to be advertising-friendly environments. "People typically read those magazines front to back, and that's always a good thing for an advertiser," said Bill Koenigsberg, chief executive of Horizon Media, an ad agency based in New York. Mr. Koenigsberg added that more advertisers had become interested in reaching women, who make up the bulk of celebrity magazine readership. Most ads in these magazines were traditionally for beauty products and other goods aimed at women. Now a wider range of advertisers want to be there, publishers said.

American Media Inc., which publishes Star, and the Bauer Publishing Company, which owns Life and Style Weekly and In Touch, are recording increases in ads for cars, pharmaceuticals and consumer electronics. Schering-Plough, for example, recently ran an ad for its drug Nasonex in Star and in Inside TV, which is published by Gemstar-TV Guide International. Canon is advertising its digital cameras in the current issue of In Touch Weekly.

Us Weekly's publisher, Vicci Lasdon Rose, said she had noticed a change in interest among car companies and electronics makers. "As recently as five years ago, I can remember them telling me they appreciate the female consumer, but they would likely not market to them," Ms. Rose said.

The advertisers are responding in part to rising circulation. Average total sales of Star, People, Us Weekly and In Touch Weekly combined were up 11.6 percent at the end of last year from 2003, with Star and In Touch sales rising about 80 percent, according to data from the Audit Bureau of Circulations.

--We already knew Americans were gossiphounds though, right? I mean, why else would you read MP&S?

Posted by: Lawrenkm at 07:32 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 377 words, total size 3 kb.

1 I only read MP&S for the articles. :-p

Posted by: Kevvy the Unnamed Source at June 14, 2005 10:31 AM (qb+8W)

2 Again, what is with the &$*^(@^%(#^ black circles around the eyes??? No, Jessica, noooooo .... By the way, why hasn't MP&S covered the story about Bam claiming publicly to have had sex with Jessica Simpson ... after she slept with Johnny Knoxville??!!

Posted by: Iceman at June 14, 2005 12:02 PM (Xx4xo)

3 I thought it was just me. I don't like this heavy, black eye make-up and false lashes the girls are wearing either. Then again, I don't get hair extensions either. Fake hair. Why?

Posted by: Nanc' at June 14, 2005 12:08 PM (Ailrt)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
16kb generated in CPU 0.0152, elapsed 0.1597 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.1484 seconds, 131 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.